Phase I/II study of sorafenib in combination with erlotinib for recurrent glioblastoma as part of a 3-arm sequential accrual clinical trial: NABTC 05-02
Author(s) -
Huanwen Chen,
John G. Kuhn,
Kathleen R. Lamborn,
Lauren E. Abrey,
Lisa M. DeAngelis,
Frank S. Lieberman,
H. Ian Robins,
Susan M. Chang,
W.K. Alfred Yung,
Jan Drappatz,
Minesh P. Mehta,
Victor A. Levin,
Kenneth Aldape,
Janet Dancey,
James R. Wright,
Michael D. Prados,
Timothy F. Cloughesy,
Patrick Y. Wen,
Mark R. Gilbert
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
neuro-oncology advances
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2632-2498
DOI - 10.1093/noajnl/vdaa124
Subject(s) - sorafenib , erlotinib , medicine , clinical endpoint , oncology , pharmacokinetics , pharmacology , phases of clinical research , tyrosine kinase inhibitor , clinical trial , epidermal growth factor receptor , hepatocellular carcinoma , cancer
BackgroundReceptor tyrosine kinases such as epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFRs) and their downstream signaling pathways such as the Ras-Raf-mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway play important roles in glioblastoma (GBM). This study investigated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of sorafenib (Ras/Raf/MAPK inhibitor) in combination with erlotinib (EGFR inhibitor) for treatment of recurrent GBMs.MethodsPatients with recurrent GBM were eligible. A novel sequential accrual trial design was used, where patients were sequentially accrued into separate treatment arms in phase I and phase II investigations to optimize recruitment efficiency. In phase I, a standard 3 + 3 format was used to identify dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and investigate pharmacokinetics. Phase II followed a 2-stage design with the primary endpoint being 6-month progression-free survival (PFS6).ResultsSixteen patients were recruited for phase I, and the MTD was determined to be sorafenib 200 mg twice daily and erlotinib 100 mg once daily. DLTs include Grade 3 hypertension, Grade 3 elevated liver transaminases, and Grade 4 elevated lipase. While erlotinib did not affect sorafenib levels, sorafenib reduced erlotinib levels. In phase II, 3 of 19 stage 1 participants were progression free at 6 months. This did not meet the predetermined efficacy endpoint, and the trial was terminated.ConclusionThis study identified the MTD and DLTs for sorafenib and erlotinib combination therapy for recurrent GBMs; however, efficacy data did not meet the primary endpoint. This study also demonstrates the feasibility of a novel sequential accrual clinical trial design that optimizes patient recruitment for multiarm studies, which is particularly effective for multicenter clinical trials.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom