English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In this study, we compare the efficiency of double sampling using point sampling and fixed-area plots for sawtimber volume estimates in a mixed-hardwood, oak-dominated stand. Multiple sample sizes and combinations were evaluated to determine optimum double-sample ratios. Results indicatedthat double, point-sampling schemes are more efficient in terms of field time and sampling errors than double-sampling schemes incorporating fixed-area plots. Data suggested that the most efficient ratio of measured and nonmeasured points with double sampling varies on the basis of the nonmeasuredvariable used and desired SE percentage levels for the inventory.

Comparing Double-Sampling Efficiency Using Various Estimators with Fixed-Area and Point Sampling