z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Survival in patients with radiological diagnoses of glioblastoma: a retrospective study of 115 patients on a best supportive care pathway
Author(s) -
James Riley,
James Hodson,
Vladimir Petrik
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
neuro-oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.005
H-Index - 125
eISSN - 1523-5866
pISSN - 1522-8517
DOI - 10.1093/neuonc/noab195.016
Subject(s) - medicine , radiological weapon , glioblastoma , retrospective cohort study , medical diagnosis , cancer , medical record , survival analysis , cancer registry , disease , surgery , radiology , cancer research
Aims Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a devastating disease with notoriously poor survival. Studies examining survival in patients given best supportive care (BSC) are few and far between. All patients harbouring brain tumours referred to the Neuro-oncology service at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Birmingham are recorded in the Somerset Cancer Registry. We set out to analyse survival times and identify patient and tumour-related factors significantly affecting prognosis. Method We identified 126 patients from 2015 to 2019 in our Somerset Cancer Registry with radiological diagnoses of glioblastoma for whom the Neuro-oncology MDT recommended BSC. We performed a retrospective analysis of clinical records and radiological images. 11 patients were excluded (8 due to insufficient imaging data, 2 who underwent subsequent surgery, 1 patient with brain metastases). Survival was measured in completed weeks since the index MDT decision. Associations between survival time and both patient- and tumour-related factors were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. All analyses were performed using IBM SPSS 22 (IBM Corp. Armonk, NY), with p<0.05 deemed to be indicative of statistical significance throughout. Results Data were available for N=115 patients (69 males, 46 females), with a mean age of 79 ± 8 years. All patients died within 32 weeks of diagnosis, with a median survival time of 8 weeks. Only 8 patients survived for more than 20 weeks. Survival was significantly shorter in those with a greater number of main cerebral structures affected (p=0.044), with a median of 6 vs. 10 weeks for 3 or more vs. 1 structures affected (hazard ratio: 1.61, 95% CI: 0.99-2.62). Bilateral tumours involving the corpus callosum were also associated with shorter survival (p=0.039). None of the other factors considered were found to be significantly associated with survival, including age (p=0.193), gender (p=0.371), performance status (p=0.300) and tumour size (p=0.331). Conclusion With the exception of the number of main cerebral structures affected (frontal, parietal, temporal and occipital lobes, corpus callosum, insula, basal ganglia and brain stem), patient- and tumour-factors traditionally used by the MDT to prognosticate do not correlate with survival time in patients receiving BSC for radiological diagnoses of GBM. With 50% of the cohort dying within 8 weeks it is clear that we must reconsider the timing of referrals to palliative and hospice care. Finally, the fact that some patients survived for more than half a year with no surgical or oncological treatment suggests that the process of selecting patients for BSC vs aggressive treatments needs refinement.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here