z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Racial disparities in supportive medication use among older patients with brain metastases: a population-based analysis
Author(s) -
Nayan Lamba,
Elie K. Mehanna,
Rachel B Kearney,
Paul J. Catalano,
Daphne A. HaasKogan,
Brian M. Alexander,
Daniel Cagney,
Kathleen A. Lee,
Ayal A. Aizer
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
neuro-oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.005
H-Index - 125
eISSN - 1523-5866
pISSN - 1522-8517
DOI - 10.1093/neuonc/noaa054
Subject(s) - medicine , odds ratio , epidemiology , logistic regression , population , antipsychotic , psychiatry , schizophrenia (object oriented programming) , environmental health
Background Brain metastases (BM) cause symptoms that supportive medications can alleviate. We assessed whether racial disparities exist in supportive medication utilization after BM diagnosis. Methods Medicare-enrolled patients linked with the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (SEER) who had diagnoses of BM between 2007 and 2016 were identified. Fourteen supportive medication classes were studied: non-opioid analgesics, opioids, anti-emetics, anti-epileptics, headache-targeting medications, steroids, cognitive aids, antidepressants, anxiolytics, antidelirium/antipsychotic agents, muscle relaxants, psychostimulants, sleep aids, and appetite stimulants. Drug administration ≤30 days following BM diagnosis was compared by race using multivariable logistic regression. Results Among 17,957 patients, headache aids, antidepressants, and anxiolytics were prescribed less frequently to African Americans (odds ratio [95% CI] = 0.81 [0.73–0.90], P < 0.001; OR = 0.68 [0.57–0.80], P < 0.001; and OR = 0.68 [0.56–0.82], P < 0.001, respectively), Hispanics (OR = 0.83 [0.73–0.94], P = 0.004 OR = 0.78 [0.64–0.97], P = 0.02; and OR = 0.63 [0.49–0.81], P < 0.001, respectively), and Asians (OR = 0.81 [0.72–0.92], P = 0.001, OR = 0.67 [0.53–0.85], P = 0.001, and OR = 0.62 [0.48–0.80], P < 0.001, respectively) compared with non-Hispanic Whites. African Americans also received fewer anti-emetics (OR = 0.75 [0.68–0.83], P < 0.001), steroids (OR = 0.84 [0.76–0.93], P < 0.001), psychostimulants (OR = 0.14 [0.03–0.59], P = 0.007), sleep aids (OR = 0.71 [0.61–0.83], P < 0.001), and appetite stimulants (OR = 0.85 [0.77–0.94], P = 0.002) than Whites. Hispanic patients less frequently received antidelirium/antipsychotic drugs (OR = 0.57 [0.38–0.86], P = 0.008), sleep aids (OR = 0.78 [0.64–0.94, P = 0.01), and appetite stimulants (OR = 0.87 [0.76–0.99], P = 0.04). Asian patients received fewer opioids (OR = 0.86 [0.75–0.99], P = 0.04), anti-emetics (OR = 0.83 [0.73–0.94], P = 0.004), anti-epileptics (OR = 0.83 [0.71–0.97], P = 0.02), steroids (OR = 0.81 [0.72–0.92], P = 0.001), muscle relaxants (OR = 0.60 [0.41–0.89], P = 0.01), and appetite stimulants (OR = 0.87 [0.76–0.99], P = 0.03). No medication class was prescribed significantly less frequently to Whites. Conclusions Disparities in supportive medication prescription for non-White/Hispanic groups with BM exist; improved provider communication and engagement with at-risk patients is needed. Key Points 1. Patients with BM commonly experience neurologic symptoms. 2. Supportive medications improve quality of life among patients with BM. 3. Non-White patients with BM receive fewer supportive medications than White patients.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom