What guidelines should or should not be: implications for guideline production
Author(s) -
Wim Van Biesen,
Sabine N van der Veer,
Kitty J. Jager,
Denis Fouque,
Christoph Wanner,
Raymond Vanholder
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
nephrology dialysis transplantation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.654
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1460-2385
pISSN - 0931-0509
DOI - 10.1093/ndt/gft291
Subject(s) - guideline , medicine , cornerstone , statement (logic) , quality (philosophy) , production (economics) , evidence based medicine , intensive care medicine , alternative medicine , pathology , law , political science , economics , art , philosophy , epistemology , visual arts , macroeconomics
European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) is the official guidance-providing body of the European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association. This paper introduces the mission statement of ERBP, and provides insight on what this implies for guideline production. We will discuss that improving patient outcome does not only require attention to high-quality evidence, but also understanding of the processes of medical decision making. We will advocate that rigorous methodology is the cornerstone of guideline production, but in those cases where this does not retrieve quality evidence, consensus-based guidance might be suitable. Based on its mission statement, ERBP advocates that guidelines should encourage shared decision making.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom