Choosing peritoneal dialysis reduces the risk of invasive access interventions | Zendy

Matthew J. Oliver | Zendy; Mauro Verrelli | Zendy; James Zacharias | Zendy; Peter G. Blake | Zendy; Amit X. Garg | Zendy; Justin Johnson | Zendy; Sanjay Pandeya | Zendy; Jeffrey Perl | Zendy; Alexander Kiss | Zendy; Robert R. Quinn | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Choosing peritoneal dialysis reduces the risk of invasive access interventions

Author(s) -

Matthew J. Oliver,

Mauro Verrelli,

James Zacharias,

Peter G. Blake,

Amit X. Garg,

Justin Johnson,

Sanjay Pandeya,

Jeffrey Perl,

Alexander Kiss,

Robert R. Quinn

Publication year - 2011

Publication title -

nephrology dialysis transplantation

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 1.654

H-Index - 168

eISSN - 1460-2385

pISSN - 0931-0509

DOI - 10.1093/ndt/gfr289

Subject(s) - medicine , peritoneal dialysis , intensive care medicine , hemodialysis , psychological intervention , dialysis , nursing

Patients choosing between hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) should be well informed of the risks and benefits of each modality. Invasive access interventions are important outcomes because frequent interventions lower patient's quality of life and consume limited resources. The objective of this study was to compare the risk of access interventions between the two modalities.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research