z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Thiazides: do they kill?
Author(s) -
Peter Groß,
Catrin Palm
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
nephrology dialysis transplantation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.654
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1460-2385
pISSN - 0931-0509
DOI - 10.1093/ndt/gfi109
Subject(s) - chlorthalidone , medicine , lisinopril , thiazide , amlodipine , medical prescription , intensive care medicine , pharmacology , diuretic , angiotensin converting enzyme , blood pressure
In 2000 and 2002 after the ALLHAT-study had been published [1,2] there was a paradigm shift in the use of thiazides. ALLHAT was a study of cardiovascular endpoints in relation to different antihypertensive treatments in 33 357 hypertensive patients observed over an average of 4.9 years. The study [1,2] found no differences between the three treatment groups [diuretics in the form of chlorthalidone vs calcium antagonists (amlodipine) vs ACEI (lisinopril)]. Consequently, after ALLHAT, it was emphasized that thiazides ought to be an integral part of the hypertensive patient’s prescription sooner or later—and health policy makers clearly favoured ‘sooner’ over ‘later’ because of their low cost. Indeed, the sale of thiazide-like agents has more than doubled between 2001 and 2004 in Germany alone. In the meantime, quite a few articles have dealt with the pros and cons of thiazides [3], when prescribed on such an extended basis. However, there appears to be yet another important side-effect of thiazides that is frequently missed—even though it may kill patients. This will be discussed herein.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom