z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Association of motivations and barriers with participation and performance in a pedometer-based intervention
Author(s) -
Anoop Sheshadri,
Piyawan Kittiskulnam,
Cynthia Delgado,
Rebecca L. Sudore,
Jennifer C. Lai,
Kirsten L. Johansen
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
nephrology dialysis transplantation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.654
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1460-2385
pISSN - 0931-0509
DOI - 10.1093/ndt/gfaa047
Subject(s) - pedometer , medicine , intervention (counseling) , physical therapy , medical education , nursing , physical activity
Background A randomized trial of a pedometer-based intervention with weekly activity goals led to increased walking among dialysis patients. However, the association of participant-expressed motivations and barriers to participation and performance in such an intervention has not been determined. Methods Thirty dialysis patients were randomized to a 12-week pedometer-based intervention with weekly step goals. Participants were asked about motivations and barriers to the increasing activity via weekly semi-scripted telephone interviews. We examined the association of these motivations and barriers with achieving weekly goals, reaching overall targets and increasing steps through multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, dialysis modality and baseline steps. Results The most common motivations were desire to maintain/improve functional ability (30%) and activity (30%). The most common barriers were health-related (33%). Motivation to maintain/improve functional ability was associated with achieving weekly goals 17.9% more often [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7–34.2] and with a greater increase in steps (1524 steps; 95% CI 61–2989) than those lacking this motivation. Experiencing a health-related barrier was not associated with the decreased achievement of weekly goals but was associated with lower odds of reaching overall targets (odds ratio = 0.06; 95% CI 0.01–0.53) and a smaller increase in steps (−1640 steps, 95% CI −3244 to −36). No patients who reported weather/environmental barriers or safety concerns reached overall targets. Conclusions Participants who express a desire to maintain/improve functional ability may be particularly suited for activity interventions. Health-related setbacks should be met with revised goals. Reporting environmental or safety concerns may merit lowering overall targets.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom