Laparoscopy and retroperitoneoscopy - novel techniques of which clinical nephrologists should be aware
Author(s) -
Jens Rassweiler
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
nephrology dialysis transplantation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.654
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1460-2385
pISSN - 0931-0509
DOI - 10.1093/ndt/14.2.313
Subject(s) - medicine , laparoscopy , surgery , general surgery
(10/110) and bowel (6/110). Trocar herniation was Introduction observed in four cases and wound infection in four patients. The complication rate depended on the Since 1991, when Clayman and colleagues [1] perdifficulty of the procedure (Table 2). A recent analysis formed transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for of our first 200 cases of retroperitoneoscopy showed a removal of an oncocytoma, laparoscopy has gained similar learning curve (Table 3). Complication, converincreasing interest world wide. In 1992, Gaur [2] sion to open surgery and reintervention rate decreased presented a technique which allowed safe and easy from 14, 10, and 6% respectively during the first 50 access to the retroperitoneal space. In the meantime, cases to 2, 4, and 2% during the last 50 cases. both video-surgical approaches to kidney and ureter have been performed frequently for the treatment of various disorders of the upper urinary tract (Table 1) [3–7]. Clinical experience
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom