z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Perceptual Awareness Scale—recent controversies and debates
Author(s) -
Morten Overgaard,
Kristian Sandberg
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
neuroscience of consciousness
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.13
H-Index - 6
ISSN - 2057-2107
DOI - 10.1093/nc/niab044
Subject(s) - introspection , consciousness , unconscious mind , perception , scale (ratio) , phenomenon , psychology , relevance (law) , cognitive psychology , focus (optics) , cognitive science , epistemology , social psychology , political science , psychoanalysis , law , geography , philosophy , physics , optics , neuroscience , cartography
Accurate insight into subjective experience is crucial for the science of consciousness. The Perceptual Awareness Scale (PAS) was created in 2004 as a method for obtaining precise introspective reports for participants in research projects, and since then, the scale has become increasingly popular. This does not mean, of course, that no critiques have been voiced. Here, we briefly recapitulate our main thoughts on the intended PAS usage and the findings of the first decade, and we update this with the latest empirical and theoretical developments. We focus specifically on findings with relevance to whether consciousness is gradual or all-or-none phenomenon, to what should be considered conscious/unconscious, and to whether PAS is preferable to alternative measures of awareness. We respond in detail to some recent, selected articles.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom