z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison of the Ames II and traditional Ames test responses with respect to mutagenicity, strain specificities, need for metabolism and correlation with rodent carcinogenicity
Author(s) -
Markus Kamber,
Sini FlückigerIsler,
G. Engelhardt,
R. Jaeckh,
Errol Zeiger
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
mutagenesis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.723
H-Index - 91
eISSN - 1464-3804
pISSN - 0267-8357
DOI - 10.1093/mutage/gep017
Subject(s) - ames test , salmonella , carcinogen , chemistry , computational biology , toxicology , biology , genetics , biochemistry , bacteria
The Ames II Salmonella mutagenicity assay procedure was used to test 71 chemicals, and the results were compared with those from the traditional Ames Salmonella test using the NTP database as the reference. All Ames II tests were performed using a fluctuation procedure in microplate format, using TAMix for the detection of base pair substitutions and TA98 to detect frameshift mutations. There was 84% agreement between the two procedures in identifying mutagens and non-mutagens, which is equivalent to the intra- and interlaboratory reproducibility of 87% for the traditional test. The two tests also performed similarly in their predictions of rodent carcinogenicity.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom