z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Standard cosmology and the BATSE number versus peak flux distribution
Author(s) -
Robert E. Rutledge,
Lam Hui,
W. H. G. Lewin
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
monthly notices of the royal astronomical society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.058
H-Index - 383
eISSN - 1365-8711
pISSN - 0035-8711
DOI - 10.1093/mnras/276.3.753
Subject(s) - physics , redshift , astrophysics , omega , cosmology , time dilation , flux (metallurgy) , luminosity , range (aeronautics) , astronomy , galaxy , theoretical physics , materials science , metallurgy , theory of relativity , quantum mechanics , composite material
The observed 2B BATSE distribution is consistent with the faintest GRBs inour sample originating from a redshift of Zmax ~ 0.8-3.0 (90\%), with the mostlikely values in the range of 1.0-2.2, and is largely insensitive to Omega formodels with no evolution. To constrain the model parameter Omega to the range0.1-1.0 using only Log N -- Log P distributions, more than 4000 GRBs, with amost likely value of ~ 9,000 GRBs to BATSE sensitivity. This requires a liveintegration time of >6 years with BATSE. Detectors sensitive to much lowerlimits (~ 70-400 in sensitivity) require ~ 200 GRBs, with <0.03 year 4pi stercoverage. We place limits on the amount of frequency density and, separately,peak luminosity evolution in the sample of GRBs. We find that frequency densityevolution models can place the faintest GRBs at Zmax ~ 10-200, withoutconflicting with the observations of relative time dilation of ~ 2.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom