z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Prevention of Alcohol-related Incidents in the U.S. Air Force: Results From a Cluster Randomized Trial
Author(s) -
Melissa A. Little,
Robert C. Klesges,
Indika Mallawaarachchi,
Timothy L. McMurry,
Kinsey Pebley,
Meghan E. McDevittMurphy,
James G. Murphy,
G. Wayne Talcott
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
military medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.442
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1930-613X
pISSN - 0026-4075
DOI - 10.1093/milmed/usab489
Subject(s) - medicine , psychological intervention , randomized controlled trial , cluster randomised controlled trial , logistic regression , public health , cluster (spacecraft) , poison control , booster (rocketry) , physical therapy , environmental health , psychiatry , physics , nursing , astronomy , computer science , programming language
Background Alcohol misuse poses significant public health concerns in the U.S. Military. An Alcohol Misconduct Prevention Program (AMPP), which includes a brief alcohol intervention (BAI) session, plus random breathalyzer program, has been shown to reduce alcohol-related incidents (ARIs) among Airmen undergoing training. Purpose The current study sought to examine whether a booster BAI administered at the end of Airmen’s training reduced ARIs out to a 1-year follow-up. Methods Participants were 26,231 U.S. Air Force Technical Trainees recruited between March 2016 and July 2018. Participants were cluster randomized by cohort to two conditions: AMPP + BAI Booster or AMPP + Bystander Intervention. The primary analysis was a comparison of the interventions’ efficacies in preventing Article 15 ARIs at a 1-year follow-up, conducted using a generalized estimating equations logistic regression model controlling for covariates. Results There was no significant difference by condition in Article 15 ARIs at the 1-year follow-up (P = .912). Conclusions Findings suggest that a booster may not be necessary to produce maximum effects beyond the initial AMPP intervention. It is also possible that alcohol behaviors changed as a result of the intervention but were not captured by our outcome measures. Future research should consider alternative outcomes or participant-tracking measures to determine whether a different or more intensive BAI booster is effective. The majority of Article 15 ARIs were for underage drinking; therefore, developing an intervention focused on this problem behavior could lead to large reductions in training costs in the military.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom