English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Lack of obstetric and gynecologic (OBGYN) procedure exposure during general surgery residency was recognized as a training gap for military general surgery residents by U.S. Navy trauma and general surgeons serving as simulation leads for the Naval Medical Center Portsmouth general surgery resident program. Program faculty requested the authors develop and implement a recurring simulation curriculum to address this training gap. The primary goal of the simulation curriculum was to increase exposure to and confidence in performing four commonly encountered OBGYN procedures in a deployed setting: spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD), Bartholin’s cyst incision and drainage with Word catheter placement, cesarean delivery, and total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH). We hypothesized that trainees exposed to the new simulation curriculum would demonstrate an increase in knowledge and confidence in these four commonly encountered OBGYN procedures. Materials and Methods The study utilized a pre- and postdesign to determine the efficacy of a newly developed simulation curriculum as measured by participants’ knowledge and confidence levels. The annual curriculum was 4 hours in duration and included a targeted lecture followed by the administration of the four OBGYN simulation skills stations: SVD, Bartholin’s, cesarean delivery, and total abdominal hysterectomy. Proctors for the simulation stations consisted of OBGYN teaching faculty who had at least 5 years of clinical teaching experience and were experienced simulation instructors. Precourse and postcourse knowledge and confidence were self-rated on a 5-point Likert scale. The learners rated the course using the Simulation Design Scale. Likert scale data were analyzed using the paired Wilcoxon rank sum test. Descriptive statistics were reported for the Simulation Design Scale. P &amp;lt; 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. This project was classified as nonhuman subjects’ research by the Naval Medical Center Portsmouth Institutional Review Board. Results Over the 2 years since curriculum implementation, 34 trainees participated in the curriculum; no trainees have had the curriculum twice. All trainees confirmed training gaps on baseline self-assessment of knowledge and confidence of all four OBGYN procedures with the most confidence reported for SVD (2.83 mean). Self-rated knowledge and confidence levels improved significantly in all four of the simulated procedures for all 34 participants (P &amp;lt; 0.001). Postcurricular surveys (82% response rate, 28/34) indicated a high satisfaction with all areas of the simulation training (4.74/5.0). Conclusions The implemented curriculum increased general surgery trainees’ knowledge and confidence in four commonly encountered OBGYN procedures and demonstrated a high level of learner satisfaction and sustainability. The curriculum exhibits high educational impact and could be a valuable adjunctive training for other non-OBGYN physicians who may need to provide OBGYN care in military environments.

military medicine

An Innovative Simulation Curriculum to Train General Surgery Residents and Medical Students on Four Commonly Encountered Obstetric and Gynecologic Procedures