z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
First-aid Training for Combatants Without Systematic Medical Education Experience on the Battlefield: Establishment and Evaluation of the Curriculum in China
Author(s) -
Hao Qin,
Daocheng Liu,
Sixu Chen,
Mingrui Lyv,
Lei Yang,
Quanwei Bao,
Zhaowen Zong
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
military medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.442
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1930-613X
pISSN - 0026-4075
DOI - 10.1093/milmed/usaa152
Subject(s) - medicine , curriculum , tourniquet , military medicine , medical education , bandage , battlefield , china , physical therapy , surgery , psychology , pedagogy , ancient history , political science , law , history
For combatants without systematic medical education experience (CSMEE), it is necessary to participate in first-aid on the battlefield, but currently there is no effective training curriculum for CSMEE in Chinese military. Materials and Methods A list of first-aid techniques based on expert consensus was formed, and then a curriculum was established according to the list. The effectiveness of the curriculum was further evaluated by comparing the scores among group A (the reserve officers trained by this curriculum), group B (the reserve officers in the military medical college trained by professional medic training system), and group C (the fresh officers trained by the Outline of Military Training and Assessment of Chinese military), through a 5-station assessment in a simulated battlefield environment, which included the following 5 techniques: tourniquet for massive extremities hemorrhage, thyrocricocentesis, thoracentesis, fixation of long bone fractures, and wound dressing with hemostatic bandage. Results The training curriculum entitled “Implementation and Assessment Standards of First-aid Training for Combatants on the Battlefield” was established. The comparison of average scores in the 5-station assessment showed that group A had better scores than group C in tourniquet for massive extremity hemorrhage, thyrocricocentesis, and thoracentesis, with no significant differences compared with group B. Also, no significant difference between groups A and B in overall completion time and overall scores was observed, whereas an excellent candidate rate in overall score of group B was better than that of group A (87.4% vs. 80.9%, χ2 = 4.40, p = 0.036), and group A was better than group C (80.9% vs. 37.5%, χ2 = 62.01, p < 0.001). Conclusion The established training curriculum is indeed effective, which improved the CSMEE’s first-aid capacity on the battlefield, and is equivalent to the level of medics.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom