Discussion paper: how much of commonsense and legal reasoning is formalizable? A review of conceptual obstacles | Zendy

James Franklin | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Discussion paper: how much of commonsense and legal reasoning is formalizable? A review of conceptual obstacles

Author(s) -

James Franklin

Publication year - 2012

Publication title -

law probability and risk

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.524

H-Index - 14

eISSN - 1470-840X

pISSN - 1470-8396

DOI - 10.1093/lpr/mgs007

Subject(s) - analogy , commonsense reasoning , similarity (geometry) , analogical reasoning , computer science , artificial intelligence , commonsense knowledge , case based reasoning , symbol (formal) , cognitive science , epistemology , natural language processing , knowledge representation and reasoning , psychology , philosophy , programming language , image (mathematics)

Fifty years of effort in artificial intelligence (AI) and the formalization of legal reasoning have produced both successes and failures. Considerable success in organizing and displaying evidence and its interrelationships has been accompanied by failure to achieve the original ambition of AI as applied to law: fully automated legal decision-making. The obstacles to formalizing legal reasoning ha...

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research