Evaluating universal sufficiency of a single logical form for inference in court | Zendy

Joseph A. Laronge | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Evaluating universal sufficiency of a single logical form for inference in court

Author(s) -

Joseph A. Laronge

Publication year - 2012

Publication title -

law probability and risk

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.524

H-Index - 14

eISSN - 1470-840X

pISSN - 1470-8396

DOI - 10.1093/lpr/mgs005

Subject(s) - argument (complex analysis) , correctness , logical consequence , computer science , dialectic , inference , transitive relation , defeasible estate , mathematics , epistemology , artificial intelligence , algorithm , philosophy , biochemistry , chemistry , combinatorics

Inference in court is subject to scrutiny for structural correctness (e.g. deductive or non-monotonic validity) and probative weight in determinations such as logical relevancy and sufficiency of evidence. These determinations are made by judges or informally by jurors who typically have little, if any, training in formal or informal logical forms. This article explores the universal sufficiency o...

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research