Commentary: A Look at Ourselves in the Mirror
Author(s) -
William G. Kronenberger
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
journal of pediatric psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.054
H-Index - 121
eISSN - 1465-735X
pISSN - 0146-8693
DOI - 10.1093/jpepsy/jsj086
Subject(s) - salary , pediatric psychology , work (physics) , field (mathematics) , value (mathematics) , psychology , applied psychology , public relations , computer science , political science , clinical psychology , law , engineering , mechanical engineering , mathematics , machine learning , pure mathematics
As a pediatric psychologist with some administrative duties, I keep a file of publications about salaries and work expectations of psychologists. Although these reports have more information than just salary data, more often than not I use them to assist with salary and contract benchmarks for my department. Opipari-Arrigan, Stark, and Drotar’s (2005) article adds much to those existing surveys of psychologists in general, because it provides specific information about salaries and work performance of pediatric psychologists. However, the value of this article goes well beyond the salary data presented in Tables 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. This article echoes the recurrent themes that have defined our field since its inception and that will shape the future of pediatric psychology. It is important for pediatric psychology to take periodic snapshots of these themes, both to provide benchmarks and to develop initiatives to meet future goals. Many key areas are covered by Opipari-Arrigan et al. (2005), but five stand out as recurrent themes for the field of pediatric psychology.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom