Parent–Adolescent Concordance Regarding Fertility Perspectives and Sperm Banking Attempts in Adolescent Males With Cancer
Author(s) -
Leehata,
Anna L. Olsavsky,
Taylor M. Dattilo,
Keagan G. Lipak,
Stacy Whiteside,
Nicholas D. Yeager,
Anthony N. Audino,
Joseph R. Rausch,
James L. Klosky,
Sarah H. O’Brien,
Gwendolyn P. Quinn,
Cynthia A. Gerhardt
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of pediatric psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.054
H-Index - 121
eISSN - 1465-735X
pISSN - 0146-8693
DOI - 10.1093/jpepsy/jsab069
Subject(s) - concordance , fertility , infertility , psychology , demography , medicine , developmental psychology , clinical psychology , population , pregnancy , environmental health , sociology , biology , genetics
Objective Approximately half of male childhood cancer survivors experience impaired fertility, yet fertility preservation (FP) remains underutilized. Although parent recommendation influences adolescents’ decision-making, parents may be uncertain and/or underrate their sons’ parenthood goals. This study assessed parent–adolescent and family-level concordance regarding adolescent fertility perspectives (i.e., values, goals) and associations with FP attempts. Methods A prospective pilot study examined the impact of a family-centered values clarification tool (FAST) on banking attempts among adolescent males newly diagnosed with cancer at risk for infertility. The FAST assessed adolescent and parent perceptions of adolescents’ fertility values and goals (i.e., perceived threat of infertility, perceived benefits/barriers to banking). Parent–adolescent concordance and family-level concordance on fertility perspectives were examined, along with associations with banking attempts and salient demographic factors. Results Ninety-eight participants (32 adolescents aged 12–20, 37 mothers, 29 fathers) from 32 families completed the FAST before treatment initiation. Parent–adolescent dyads were concordant on approximately one-half of responses. Banking attempts were associated with higher family-level concordance regarding perceived benefits, r(32) = .40, p = .02. Older adolescent age was associated with higher family-level concordance regarding perceived threat, r(31) = .37, p = .04, and benefits, r(32) = .40, p = .03. Fathers’ education was associated with higher family-level concordance regarding barriers, r(21) = .53, p = .01. Conclusions When parents were concordant with their son’s fertility values and goals, particularly perceived benefits, adolescents were more likely to attempt FP. Clinicians should facilitate sharing of fertility perspectives within families before cancer treatment, especially with younger adolescents. Psychosocial support for families facing FP decisions is recommended at diagnosis and across the care continuum.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom