z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Use of Science and Modeling by Practitioners in Landscape-Scale Management Decisions
Author(s) -
Eric M. White,
Kreg Lindberg,
Emily Jane Davis,
Thomas A. Spies
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of forestry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.636
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1938-3746
pISSN - 0022-1201
DOI - 10.1093/jofore/fvz007
Subject(s) - scale (ratio) , reading (process) , public relations , public engagement , resource (disambiguation) , service (business) , science communication , political science , environmental resource management , sociology , science education , business , computer science , geography , marketing , cartography , environmental science , computer network , law
Scientific knowledge and tools have central roles in contemporary federal forest programs that promote restoration in large landscapes and across ownerships. Although we know much about the role of science in decisionmaking and ways that science can be better linked to practice, we know less about manager perspectives about science and science tools, and the perceived role of both in planning. We surveyed Forest Service resource managers in the western United States to address this knowledge gap. Respondents engaged most frequently with science via reading research publications; direct engagement with scientists was less common. There was widespread agreement that science was a useful input to decisionmaking. Managers believed more weight should be placed on science in decisionmaking in cases of low public consensus than in cases of high public consensus. Managers with the most frequent engagement with science generally held more positive views towards science and its role in decisionmaking.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom