The Relative Impact of Urinary and Sexual Function vs Bother on Health Utility for Men With Prostate Cancer
Author(s) -
Chang Wook Jeong,
Annika Herlemann,
Janet E. Cowan,
Jeanette M. Broering,
Renske M.T. ten Ham,
Leslie Wilson,
Peter R. Carroll,
Matthew R. Cooperberg
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
jnci cancer spectrum
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.345
H-Index - 10
ISSN - 2515-5091
DOI - 10.1093/jncics/pkaa044
Subject(s) - medicine , sexual function , prostate cancer , bowel function , quality of life (healthcare) , prostate , gynecology , cohort , reproductive health , cancer , environmental health , population , nursing
Function and bother are related but distinct aspects of health-related quality of life. The objective of this study was to compare quantitatively the relative impacts of function and bother in urinary, sexual, and bowel outcomes on health utility as a reflection of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Our analysis included participants in the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor utility supplementary study, with a final cohort of 1617 men. Linear regression on the patients’ function and bother summary scores (0-100) from the University of California, Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index was performed to predict bias-corrected health utilities. Urinary and sexual bother were associated with each health utility, and their coefficients were 3.7 and 20.8 times greater, respectively, than those of the corresponding function. To our knowledge, our study provides the first quantitative and direct comparison of the impacts of function vs bother on health utility.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom