Uncertainty Over DAT Testing
Author(s) -
Charlie Schmidt
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
jnci journal of the national cancer institute
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.797
H-Index - 356
eISSN - 1460-2105
pISSN - 0027-8874
DOI - 10.1093/jnci/djs429
Subject(s) - medicine , test (biology) , colonoscopy , fecal occult blood , colorectal cancer , wonder , conversation , alternative medicine , family medicine , colorectal cancer screening , cancer , psychology , pathology , paleontology , social psychology , communication , biology
Dr. Kimberly Lovett was frustrated. Her patient had tested positive on the fecal occult blood test used in colon cancer screening, and as a primarycare doctor in the Department of Family and Preventive Medicine at the University of California, San Diego, Lovett knew the next step in confirming the diagnosis was a colonoscopy. “But why can’t you order the blood test?” demanded her patient, determined to avoid colonoscopy at all costs. Lovett responded that such a test doesn’t exist, yet the patient was adamant that it did—he claimed to have seen it advertised by a Web-based company that sells blood biomarker analyses. After a tense conversation, Lovett’s patient was convinced that the ad had misled him, but he left bewildered, wondering why a company can claim it can diagnose colon cancer when it can’t. Many practicing physicians wonder the
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom