z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Colonoscopy vs Sigmoidoscopy: New Studies Fuel Ongoing Debate
Author(s) -
Charlie Schmidt
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
jnci journal of the national cancer institute
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.797
H-Index - 356
eISSN - 1460-2105
pISSN - 0027-8874
DOI - 10.1093/jnci/djs406
Subject(s) - sigmoidoscopy , colonoscopy , medicine , colorectal cancer , fecal occult blood , bowel preparation , incidence (geometry) , general surgery , sedation , colorectal cancer screening , cancer , surgery , physics , optics
Mounting evidence shows that colorectal screening reduces cancer incidence and mortality, but scientists still disagree about the best way to look for risky polyps. Clinicians in the US favor colonoscopy, while European health systems rely far more on flexible sigmoidoscopy–a cheaper, less invasive method that can be performed without sedation, but that also reaches only into the distal or “left” side of the colon, while leaving the proximal or “right” side nearer to the large intestine un-monitored. According to Martin Brown, M.D., chief of the health services and economics branch at the National Cancer Institute (NCI), colonoscopy rates among those eligible for the procedure in the US (generally individuals aged 50 and over) climbed dramatically after Medicare began covering the procedure–from 19% in 2000 to 54.6% in 2010. Rates of flexible sigmoidoscopy (in combination with fecal occult blood testing, or FOBT) declined from 9.4% to 1.3% over the same time period.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom