z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Biotech Crops' Seal of Safety Does Not Convince Skeptics
Author(s) -
Barbara P. Keogh
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
jnci journal of the national cancer institute
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.797
H-Index - 356
eISSN - 1460-2105
pISSN - 0027-8874
DOI - 10.1093/jnci/djs196
Subject(s) - microbiology and biotechnology , government (linguistics) , skepticism , business , risk analysis (engineering) , genetically engineered , food and drug administration , public economics , biology , economics , genetics , philosophy , linguistics , gene , epistemology
long-term toxic effects of consuming foods genetically manipulated to promote herbicide tolerance, insect resistance, or other traits, and that longer-term studies are needed to truly demonstrate safety. In 1992, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration called foods containing ingredients derived from the recombinant DNA technology used to make GMOs “substantially similar” to conventional ones and deemed them “generally recognized as safe.” Since then, proponents and government agencies have insisted that the more extensive tests required for drugs or pesticides aren’t necessary. Only a latent trend—such as an inexplicable spike in cancer rates—could signal that consuming GMOs over several decades may lead to health problems stemming from the buildup of toxins in the body.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom