Framing and legitimating EU legal regulation of human gene-editing technologies: key facets and functions of an imaginary
Author(s) -
Aurélie Mahalatchimy,
Pin Lean Lau,
Phoebe Li,
Mark Flear
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of law and the biosciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.904
H-Index - 18
ISSN - 2053-9711
DOI - 10.1093/jlb/lsaa080
Subject(s) - the imaginary , framing (construction) , safeguarding , human enhancement , emerging technologies , political science , sociology , law and economics , law , computer science , biology , genetics , engineering , medicine , psychology , nursing , structural engineering , psychotherapist , artificial intelligence
Gene-editing technologies, ie those able to make changes in the DNA of an organism, are the object of global competition and a regulatory race between countries and regions. There is an attempt to craft legal frameworks protective enough for users, but flexible enough for developers of gene-editing technologies. This article examines the imaginary built into the framing of EU-level legal regulation of human gene-editing technologies and identifies its three key related facets: the tension around naturalness; safeguarding morality and ethics; and the pursuit of medical objectives for the protection of human health. Concerns around the use of gene-editing technologies in relation to eugenics and human enhancement have produced a multifaceted imaginary. We argue that this imaginary not only places a limit on EU-level regulation, despite a strong EU competence in respect of the internal market, but also seeks to ensure its legitimation.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom