Regulatory flexibility for COVID-19 research
Author(s) -
Holly Fernandez Lynch,
Neal W. Dickert,
Patricia J. Zettler,
Steven Joffe,
Emily A. Largent
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of law and the biosciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.904
H-Index - 18
ISSN - 2053-9711
DOI - 10.1093/jlb/lsaa057
Subject(s) - flexibility (engineering) , pandemic , covid-19 , institutional review board , relevance (law) , human research , informed consent , compliance (psychology) , quality (philosophy) , clinical research , political science , medicine , business , public relations , engineering ethics , psychology , alternative medicine , law , virology , disease , pathology , engineering , psychiatry , infectious disease (medical specialty) , philosophy , mathematics , outbreak , social psychology , epistemology , statistics
Clinical research is critical to combatting COVID-19, but regulatory requirements for human subjects protection may sometimes pose a challenge in pandemic circumstances. Although regulators have offered some helpful guidance for research during the pandemic, we identify further compliance challenges regarding institutional review board (IRB) review and approval, informed consent, emergency research, and research involving incarcerated people. Our proposals for regulatory flexibility in these areas seek to satisfy the goals of protecting participants and promoting the development of high-quality evidence to improve patient care. These recommendations may have relevance beyond the COVID-19 pandemic to enhance the efficiency of research oversight and participant protection more broadly.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom