36 Common Data Elements (CDE) in Burn Care Documentation: A Single-center Retrospective Review
Author(s) -
Justin Dang,
Rendell Bernabe,
Joshua Lin,
Yuki Kuromaru,
Christopher H Pham,
Samantha Huang,
Megha Sheth,
Haig A Yenikomshian,
Justin Gillenwater
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
journal of burn care and research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.679
H-Index - 78
eISSN - 1559-0488
pISSN - 1559-047X
DOI - 10.1093/jbcr/irac012.039
Subject(s) - medicine , documentation , burn center , retrospective cohort study , medical record , total body surface area , medical emergency , burn injury , trauma center , emergency medicine , data collection , patient safety , surgery , poison control , health care , statistics , mathematics , computer science , economics , programming language , economic growth
Thorough documentation is an important component of delivering quality patient care. Documentation of common data elements (CDE), defined as a precise question with a specified set of responses used across multiple databases or studies, can also assist in improving data collection. Currently, burn care does not have an existing set of CDEs despite their potential to be a reproducible and reliable system for data collection which leads to improved burn care. Our institution performed a retrospective review of patient charts to identify the consistency of our burn care documentation and highlight deficits that could be remedied by the implementation of CDEs. Methods This was a single-center retrospective review of patient charts from 2014-2019. Thirty-three CDEs were investigated. Two hundred four patient charts were randomly selected for review. We presented extracted CDEs as frequencies and percentages. Information was obtained from the history and physical notes, progress notes, and discharge summaries. Results Our review yielded 204 patient records. The note/record of some data points could not be identified and were excluded from the qualitative calculation. Of the data points that included more than 200 records, 86% percent specified the date of injury, 88% recorded the admission date, 99% reported burn etiology, 94% included total body surface area (TBSA) burned, 94% included burn thickness, 99% specified anatomic injury location, 97% included information about wound care agents/dressings, and 24% recorded the patient’s pain scores. Thirty percent (49/164) reported the presence or absence of inhalation injury. Twenty-six percent (38/148) listed reported presence or absence of non-burn related injuries. Sixty-four percent (127/200) reported presence or absence of comorbid conditions. Other data points were found with varying frequencies (Table 1). Conclusions Consistent documentation of burn care remains challenging and many variables are collected inconsistently. Our results highlight the need for CDEs in burn care to standardize documentation.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom