z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Variations in enzymatic hydrolysis efficiencies for amitriptyline and cyclobenzaprine in urine
Author(s) -
Kaylee R. Mastrianni,
L. Andrew Lee,
William E. Brewer,
Nagaraju Dongari,
Michael G. Barna,
Stephen L. Morgan
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of analytical toxicology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.161
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1945-2403
pISSN - 0146-4760
DOI - 10.1093/jat/bkw062
Subject(s) - chemistry , hydrolysis , glucuronidase , chromatography , enzyme , urine , analyte , arylsulfatase , enzymatic hydrolysis , helix pomatia , substrate (aquarium) , biochemistry , biology , ecology , snail
A collaborative study was conducted to investigate discrepancies in recoveries of two commonly prescribed compounds, amitriptyline and cyclobenzaprine, in patient urine samples when hydrolyzed with different enzymes from different sources. A 2- to 10-fold increase in analyte recoveries was seen for patient samples hydrolyzed using a recombinant β-glucuronidase (IMCSzyme™) over samples hydrolyzed with β-glucuronidase from Haliotis rufescens We report outcomes from four commercially available β-glucuronidase enzymes (IMCSzyme™, Patella vulgata, Helix pomatia and H. rufescens) on patient samples that tested positive for amitriptyline and cyclobenzaprine. Our results confirm reduced hydrolysis of glucuronides by β-glucuronidases isolated from mollusks, but near complete conversion when using the recombinant enzyme. Our premise is that systematic differences in hydrolysis efficiencies due to varying substrate affinity among enzyme subtypes potentially impacts accuracy and reliability of measurements.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom