z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Fenofibric Acid Can Cause False-Positive Urine Methylenedioxymethamphetamine Immunoassay Results
Author(s) -
Loreto Quesada,
Isabel Gomila,
Antonia Fe,
Miguel Ángel Servera,
Chris Yates,
Daniel MorellGarcía,
Bartomeu Castanyer,
Bernardino Barceló Martín
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of analytical toxicology
Language(s) - Uncategorized
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.161
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1945-2403
pISSN - 0146-4760
DOI - 10.1093/jat/bkv074
Subject(s) - ecstasy , chromatography , urine , chemistry , immunoassay , fenofibrate , gas chromatography–mass spectrometry , metabolite , mass spectrometry , gas chromatography , pharmacology , medicine , biochemistry , psychiatry , antibody , immunology
We present a false-positive result of ecstasy (3,4-methylenedioxy-NN-methylamphetamine) screening due to the therapeutic use of fenofibrate, an antihyperlipidemic drug. Our hypothesis was that the main metabolite of fenofibrate, fenofibric acid, was responsible for this cross-reactivity on a DRI(®) Ecstasy Assay, using a cut-off of 500 ng/mL. We estimated that the addition of 225 µg/mL pure fenofibric acid to blank urine would be sufficient to result in a positive DRI(®) Ecstasy Assay. The results obtained on the urine samples analyses of the patient show that the DRI(®) Ecstasy Assay resulted negative 2 days after discontinuing fenofibrate treatment, when the urine fenofibric acid concentration corrected by creatinine and determinated by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry was 20.3 µg/mg creatinine. The cross-reactivity data for fenofibric acid would seem to indicate that there was insufficient concentration of measured compound to account for the positive immunochemical results for ecstasy. This apparent discrepancy can be explained in several ways, one of them is that the β-glucuronidase-resistent fenofibric acid isomers are responsible. This process could explain the low recovery of free fenofibric acid when we use the developed method for its quantification in urine samples. Positive results on immunoassay screening must be considered presumptive until confirmation with another method based on a different principle, preferably gas chromatography-mass spectrometry or liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom