z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Mixed-Mode Solid-Phase Extraction Procedures for the Determination of MDMA and Metabolites in Urine Using LC-MS, LC-UV, or GC-NPD
Author(s) -
K. M. Jenkins,
Michael S. Young,
Claude R. Mallet,
Albert A. Elian
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
journal of analytical toxicology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.161
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1945-2403
pISSN - 0146-4760
DOI - 10.1093/jat/28.1.50
Subject(s) - chromatography , solid phase extraction , urine , mdma , chemistry , extraction (chemistry) , gas chromatography–mass spectrometry , mass spectrometry , pharmacology , medicine , biochemistry
A solid-phase extraction (SPE) procedure was developed for the liquid chromatographic-mass spectrometric (LC-MS) analysis of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and its metabolites 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) and N,alpha-dimethyl-(3-methoxy-4-hydroxybenzene) (HMMA) ethanamine in urine. The procedure, with modifications, was also demonstrated using LC-UV and GC-nitrogen-phosphorus detection (NPD). A mixed-mode cation exchange SPE cartridge was effective for both reducing matrix impurities and for preconcentrating the analytes for the analysis. The concentration range investigated spanned from 0.10 to 20 microg/mL with recoveries ranging from 88% to 108% for all analytes using LC-MS. Both LC methods and the GC method allow for complete resolution of MDMA, MDA, and HMMA, as well as the internal standards (MDMA-d5 and 3,4-methylenedioxypropylamphetamine) in less than 10 min. Lower limits of quantitation (LLOQ) for the LC-MS method were 0.1 microg/mL for MDMA and MDA and 0.04 microg/mL for HMMA. Compared with LC-UV and GC-NPD, the LC-MS method requires the least amount of sample manipulation and provided the highest sample throughput. GC-NPD gave comparable selectivity, but the extra sample manipulation steps required contributed to lower recovery, lower precision, and increased time for the analysis. LC-MS analysis demonstrated better selectivity for the determination of HMMA in incurred samples compared with LC-UV analysis.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom