English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Little is understood about the relationships among environmental enrichment, temperament, productivity, and feeding behavior in cattle. The objective of this study was to examine the effect of divergent behavioral phenotypes for brush usage on temperament, productivity, and feeding behavior patterns in beef cattle. Four pens of Brahman cattle (n = 2 pens with 15 heifers/pen, and n = 2 pens with 19 steers/pen) were housed in dry lots each equipped with four electronic feedbunks (GrowSafe Systems). Animals were video recorded throughout an 85d commercial gain test. Video recordings were decoded on d 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, and 64 using continuous observations for 15 minutes every 30 minutes from 08:00 to 20:00 to determine the total daily brush usage for focal animals that were selected based on d -19 exit velocities. Exit velocity and body weight were measured on d -19, 0, 1, 25, 50, and 70 and feeding behavior was monitored daily using the GrowSafe 4000E system. Animals were classified within gender into one of three phenotypes (high, medium, and low brush usage) based on ±0.5SD from the brush usage mean. A General Linear Mixed Model (PROC GLIMMIX) with brush use phenotype, sex and the interaction of these as fixed effects and pen as random effect was used for data analysis. For high and medium brush use phenotypes, steers had greater final BW than heifers (P = 0.0005), while heifer and steer final body weight did not differ when brush usage was low. High brush use steers had greater ADG (P = 0.0002) than high and medium brush use heifers, and low brush use steers and heifers. This same pattern was observed for DMI (P = 0.0003). Heifers were more temperamental than steers (P = 0.0008), and high and medium brush use heifers had faster exit velocities than low brush use steers. These results suggest that monitoring animal’s pleasurable behavior (brush use), rather than fear response alone, may be a useful behavioral indicator of cattle productivity.

journal of animal science/journal of animal science ... and asas reference compendium

9 Evaluating the Utility of Individual Cattle Brush Use Behavior as a Novel Behavioral Phenotype Regarding Productivity, Temperament, and Feeding Behavior of Bos Indicus Steers and Heifers Housed in Dry Lots