The case for wearable proximity devices to inform physical distancing among healthcare workers
Author(s) -
Sara C. Keller,
Alejandra Salinas,
Opeyemi Oladapo-Shittu,
Sara E. Cosgrove,
Robin LewisCherry,
Patience Osei,
Ayşe P. Gürses,
Ron Jacak,
Kristina Zudock,
Kianna Blount,
Kenneth Bowden,
Clare Rock,
Anna Sick-Samuels,
Briana Vecchio-Pagán
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
jamia open
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2574-2531
DOI - 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab095
Subject(s) - beacon , wearable computer , distancing , health care , covid-19 , wearable technology , medicine , computer science , telecommunications , embedded system , disease , pathology , infectious disease (medical specialty) , economics , economic growth
Objective Despite the importance of physical distancing in reducing SARS-CoV-2 transmission, this practice is challenging in healthcare. We piloted use of wearable proximity beacons among healthcare workers (HCWs) in an inpatient unit to highlight considerations for future use of trackable technologies in healthcare settings. Materials and Methods We performed a feasibility pilot study in a non-COVID adult medical unit from September 28 to October 28, 2020. HCWs wore wearable proximity beacons, and interactions defined as <6 feet for ≥5 s were recorded. Validation was performed using direct observations. Results A total of 6172 close proximity interactions were recorded, and with the removal of 2033 false-positive interactions, 4139 remained. The highest proportion of interactions occurred between 7:00 Am–9:00 Am. Direct observations of HCWs substantiated these findings. Discussion This pilot study showed that wearable beacons can be used to monitor and quantify HCW interactions in inpatient settings. Conclusion Technology can be used to track HCW physical distancing.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom