Online physician ratings fail to predict actual performance on measures of quality, value, and peer review | Zendy

Timothy J. Daskivich | Zendy; Justin Houman | Zendy; Garth Fuller | Zendy; Jeanne T. Black | Zendy; Hyung L. Kim | Zendy; Brennan Spiegel | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Online physician ratings fail to predict actual performance on measures of quality, value, and peer review

Author(s) -

Timothy J. Daskivich,

Justin Houman,

Garth Fuller,

Jeanne T. Black,

Hyung L. Kim,

Brennan Spiegel

Publication year - 2017

Publication title -

journal of the american medical informatics association

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 1.614

H-Index - 150

eISSN - 1527-974X

pISSN - 1067-5027

DOI - 10.1093/jamia/ocx083

Subject(s) - specialty , quartile , medicine , quality (philosophy) , family medicine , association (psychology) , observational study , medline , psychology , confidence interval , philosophy , epistemology , pathology , political science , law , psychotherapist

Patients use online consumer ratings to identify high-performing physicians, but it is unclear if ratings are valid measures of clinical performance. We sought to determine whether online ratings of specialist physicians from 5 platforms predict quality of care, value of care, and peer-assessed physician performance.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research