z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A multi-institution evaluation of clinical profile anonymization
Author(s) -
Raymond Heatherly,
Luke V. Rasmussen,
Peggy Peissig,
Jennifer A. Pacheco,
Paul A. Harris,
Joshua C. Denny,
Bradley Malin
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of the american medical informatics association
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.614
H-Index - 150
eISSN - 1527-974X
pISSN - 1067-5027
DOI - 10.1093/jamia/ocv154
Subject(s) - data anonymization , context (archaeology) , generalization , computer science , biorepository , health records , compromise , systematized nomenclature of medicine , diagnosis code , electronic health record , safeguarding , medical record , medicine , data mining , population , snomed ct , information privacy , computer security , mathematics , health care , geography , environmental health , bioinformatics , biobank , terminology , social science , philosophy , economic growth , mathematical analysis , linguistics , archaeology , sociology , biology , radiology , nursing , economics
There is an increasing desire to share de-identified electronic health records (EHRs) for secondary uses, but there are concerns that clinical terms can be exploited to compromise patient identities. Anonymization algorithms mitigate such threats while enabling novel discoveries, but their evaluation has been limited to single institutions. Here, we study how an existing clinical profile anonymization fares at multiple medical centers.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom