z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
PRO: Carbapenems should be used for ALL infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales
Author(s) -
David L. Paterson,
Burcu Isler,
Patrick N. A. Harris
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
jac-antimicrobial resistance
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2632-1823
DOI - 10.1093/jacamr/dlab013
Subject(s) - cefepime , meropenem , ceftriaxone , piperacillin , tazobactam , microbiology and biotechnology , antibiotics , medicine , cephalosporin , trimethoprim , biology , antibiotic resistance , bacteria , imipenem , pseudomonas aeruginosa , genetics
Ceftriaxone resistance in the Enterobacterales is typically the result of production of ESBLs or AmpC β-lactamases. The genes encoding these enzymes are often co-located with other antibiotic resistance genes leading to resistance to aminoglycosides, quinolones and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Carbapenems are stable to ESBLs and AmpC giving them reliable in vitro activity against producers of these β-lactamases. In contrast, piperacillin/tazobactam and amoxicillin/clavulanate are compromised by co-production of OXA-1, which is not inhibited by tazobactam or clavulanate. These in vitro findings provide an explanation for the MERINO trial outcomes, where 3.7% (7/191) randomized to meropenem died compared with 12.3% (23/187) randomized to piperacillin/tazobactam as definitive treatment of bloodstream infection due to ceftriaxone-resistant organisms. No randomized trials have yet put cefepime and carbapenems head to head, but some observational studies have shown worse outcomes with cefepime. We argue that carbapenems are the antibiotics of choice for ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom