z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
CON: Carbapenems are NOT necessary for all infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales
Author(s) -
Jesús RodríguezBaño,
Belén GutiérrezGutiérrez,
Álvaro Pascual
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
jac-antimicrobial resistance
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2632-1823
DOI - 10.1093/jacamr/dlaa112
Subject(s) - ceftriaxone , piperacillin , tazobactam , piperacillin/tazobactam , cephalosporin , carbapenem , antibiotics , medicine , intensive care medicine , microbiology and biotechnology , biology , antibiotic resistance , imipenem , pseudomonas aeruginosa , bacteria , genetics
Carbapenems are considered the drugs of choice for the treatment of serious infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales. However, because of the dramatic increase in carbapenem-resistant organisms worldwide, finding alternatives to carbapenems is a must. The potential options include β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, temocillin, cephamycins and some non-β-lactam drugs. The most controversial is piperacillin/tazobactam; the results of the MERINO trial are challenged because the isolates of patients with worse outcomes were frequently not susceptible to piperacillin/tazobactam when studied by reference methods, and also because the drug was not administered in extended infusion. Other potential options are briefly discussed. We conclude that carbapenems are not necessary for all patients with infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom