Open AccessMeasuring antimicrobial prescribing quality in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) services: development and evaluation of a dedicated national antimicrobial prescribing survey
Author(s) -
N. Deborah Friedman,
Seok Lim,
Rodney James,
Robyn Ingram,
Mary O’Reilly,
James Pollard,
Sonia Koning,
Christian George,
Arjun Rajkhowa,
Douglas Johnson,
Kirsty Buising
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
jac-antimicrobial resistance
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2632-1823
DOI - 10.1093/jacamr/dlaa058
Subject(s) - antimicrobial stewardship , medicine , medical prescription , antimicrobial , intensive care medicine , audit , antibiotics , antibiotic resistance , nursing , chemistry , management , organic chemistry , microbiology and biotechnology , economics , biology
Background Antimicrobial stewardship programmes are important in driving safety and quality of antimicrobial prescribing. The National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey (NAPS) is a point-prevalence audit of inpatient antimicrobial prescribing in Australian hospitals. Objectives To design and adapt the NAPS tool for use in the outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) and hospital-in-the-home (HITH) setting. Methods An inter-disciplinary working group with expertise in OPAT and HITH services was established to adapt the NAPS template for use in the OPAT setting—called HITH-NAPS. This was initially trialled in 5 HITH services, subsequently adapted following participant feedback, then offered nationally to 50 services in 2017. Results There were 1154 prescriptions for 715 patients audited via the HITH-NAPS. The most common antimicrobials prescribed were cefazolin (22%), flucloxacillin (12%), piperacillin/tazobactam (10%) and ceftriaxone (10%). The most common infections treated were cellulitis (30%) and respiratory tract infections (14%). Eighty-seven percent of prescriptions were assessed as appropriate, 11% inappropriate and 2% not assessable. Prolonged durations of antimicrobials and unnecessarily broad-spectrum antibiotics were used in 9% of prescriptions. Conclusions The HITH-NAPS pilot project revealed that auditing of this type is feasible in HITH. It showed that antibiotic use in these HITH services was generally appropriate, but there are some areas for improvement. A national OPAT/HITH-NAPS can facilitate benchmarking between services, identify potentially inappropriate prescribing and help guide quality improvement.