z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Clinimetric properties and suitability of selected quality indicators for assessing antibiotic use in hospitalized adults: a multicentre point prevalence study in 24 hospitals in Germany
Author(s) -
Gesche Först,
Winfried V. Kern,
Nadine Weber,
Christiane Querbach,
Johannes Kleideiter,
Holger Knoth,
Stefan Hagel,
Andreas Ambrosch,
Micha Löbermann,
Philipp Schröder,
J Borde,
Michaela Steib–Bauert,
Katja de With,
Faranak Binesch,
Beate Clausing,
A Devidè,
Martina Donat,
Katja Endler,
Susanne Feihl,
Annette Freidank,
Edeltraud Früchtel-Unterholzner,
Norbert Gödde,
Ralf Gründel,
Wolfgang Grzibiela,
Réné Kaiser,
Piotr Kawecki,
Stefan Kohlbrenner,
Johanna Lerner,
Edeltraud Lörs,
Matthias J. Müller,
Nikolas Papathanasiou,
Heidrun Peltroche,
Wiltrud Probst,
Jens Putzbach,
Marion Reimer,
Ann-Christin Reinwald,
Ruth Rusche,
Martin Scheerer,
Cláudia Schulz,
Enrico Zessin
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.124
H-Index - 194
eISSN - 1460-2091
pISSN - 0305-7453
DOI - 10.1093/jac/dkz364
Subject(s) - medicine , guideline , medical prescription , quality assurance , pneumonia , antimicrobial stewardship , quality management , antibiotic stewardship , emergency medicine , intensive care medicine , antibiotics , operations management , antibiotic resistance , nursing , management system , external quality assessment , pathology , microbiology and biotechnology , economics , biology
Objectives The capability to measure and monitor the quality of antibiotic prescribing is an important component of antibiotic stewardship (ABS) programmes. Several catalogues of consensus-based structure and process-of-care quality indicators (QIs) have been proposed, but only a few studies have tested and validated ABS QIs in practice tests. This multicentre study determined the clinimetric properties and suitability of a set of 33 process QIs for ABS that had earlier been developed and in part recommended in a German–Austrian hospital ABS practice guideline. Methods Two point prevalence surveys were conducted in a convenience sample of 24 acute care hospitals throughout Germany, and data of all screened adult inpatients with prescription of a systemic antibiotic at a given day (n=4310) were included in the study. For each QI, the following clinimetric properties were assessed: applicability, feasibility, performance, case mix stability and interobserver reliability. Results Eighteen QIs were considered sufficiently feasible, applicable and reliable, and had adequate room for improvement. The finally selected QIs primarily cover antibiotic therapy of common infections (bloodstream infection, pneumonia and urinary tract infection), while two of the QIs each address surgical prophylaxis and general aspects of antibiotic administration. Conclusions Practice tests may be important to test the suitability of consensus process-of-care QIs in the field of hospital ABS. The 18 selected QIs considered suitable enough for hospital ABS in this study should be regarded as priority QIs useful for internal quality control and assurance. More research and additional practice tests may be needed to confirm their suitability for external quality assessment schemes.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom