English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

and these results were considered the reference standard against which all other results were compared. Temocillin Etests were used according to the manufacturer's instructions. Susceptibility to temocillin using the Phoenix system was determined according to BSAC breakpoints for Enterobacteriaceae for systemic infections (susceptible if MIC ≤8 mg/L). 3 If the Etest or Phoenix results were within a 2-fold dilution of the BMD MIC for an isolate, the methods were deemed as being in agreement. Unless the Phoenix result advised a retest, e.g. due to insufficient growth, the first test results were used for the evaluation and comparison of the different antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) methods. Disagreements between BMD and the Etest or Phoenix methods were then subjected to further investigation by repeating the Phoenix test in duplicate. Etest MICs showed good correlation with those obtained by BMD—they were within one doubling dilution in 93.6% of isolates. Overall, there appeared to be discrepant results between the Phoenix system and one of the alternative susceptibility methods for 102 isolates (97 deemed intermediate by Phoenix and 5 deemed resistant) and a discrepancy between Phoenix and both other methods in 93. Therefore, Phoenix AST was repeated, in duplicate, for the 102 isolates to confirm or refute the original Phoenix result. Of these 102 isolates, the second and third Phoenix AST results were consistent with the original result for 88 (86.3%). However, for 17 (16.7%) samples, the initial Phoenix AST result was not consistent between runs—these results were therefore excluded from our analysis. Of the 264 remaining isolates, 246 were proven to be susceptible using BMD (MIC ≤8 mg/L) and concordant results were found by Etest in 236 (95.9%). However, the Phoenix system declared only 162 (65.9%) susceptible. Seventeen isolates were 'susceptible only for UTI' (MIC .8 to ≤32 mg/L) by BMD and 26 by Etest. In comparison, far more were categorized as 'susceptible only for UTI' by Phoenix—96. Only one isolate was found to be resistant (MIC .32 mg/L) by the reference method, and two by Etest, whereas six were declared resistant by the Phoenix method. Table 1 summarizes the results for temocillin susceptibility for all three methods. In conclusion, this study indicates that 'susceptible' results produced by the Phoenix system, using the NMIC-84 card according to the manufacturer's recommendations, are reliable. However, the majority of isolates found to be 'susceptible only for UTI' and 'resistant' by Phoenix were actually fully susceptible (MIC ≤8 …

Pharmacokinetics of maraviroc administered at 150 mg once daily in association with lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV-positive treatment-naive patients