z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparative evaluation of two different methods of inoculum preparation for antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi
Author(s) -
Amel Aberkane
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.124
H-Index - 194
eISSN - 1460-2091
pISSN - 0305-7453
DOI - 10.1093/jac/dkf187
Subject(s) - hemocytometer , intraclass correlation , antifungal , reproducibility , biology , microbiology and biotechnology , optical density , correlation coefficient , veterinary medicine , chromatography , chemistry , mathematics , medicine , statistics , biochemistry , ophthalmology
Two different methods of inoculum preparation for susceptibility testing were analysed. The first method was adjustment of inoculum size by haemocytometer counting. The second method was spectrophotometric adjustment at 530 nm. The reliability of both methods was assessed by colony counting. The overall agreement between colony counting and haemocytometer counts was 93.6%, and the intraclass coefficient correlation was 0.71 (P < 0.05). Pearson's correlation index between colony counts and optical density values was -0.059 (P > 0.05). Optical densities ranged between 0.01 and 1.2, showing less reproducibility than expected by the NCCLS M 38-P standard. Haemocytometer counting is a more reliable method of inoculum preparation for antifungal susceptibility testing.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom