English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We performed a prospective study to compare the Etest and the microdilution method (NCCLS guidelines) for determining the MICs of fluconazole, itraconazole, flucytosine and amphotericin B for 35 strains of Cryptococcus neoformans. For the microdilution method (MDM) RPMI 1640 medium with 2% glucose was used for fluconazole, itraconazole and flucytosine, and Antibiotic Medium 3 for amphotericin B. For the Etest, RPMI 1640 medium with 2% glucose and solidified with 1.5% agar was used for the four antifungal agents. Amphotericin B was also tested on Antibiotic Medium 3 solidified with 1.5% agar. Fluconazole and flucytosine MICs by the Etest showed good correlation with the broth MDM (81.1 and 89.2% agreement within two dilutions, respectively). With the tested population of itraconazole- and amphotericin B-susceptible isolates, the MIC agreement for itraconazole was 54%; amphotericin B showed the lowest agreement (8.1% on Antibiotic Medium 3 and 13.5% on RPMI).

Comparison of the Etest and microdilution method for antifungal susceptibility testing of Cryptococcus neoformans to four antifungal agents