English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Activity of CP 99,219 (trovafloxacin), clinafloxacin, ciprofloxacin, sparfloxacin, lomefloxacin and cefuroxime against 4 penicillin-susceptible, 2 penicillin-intermediate and 4 penicillin-resistant pneumococci was tested by MIC and time-kill methodology. Bacteriostatic values for all three groups did not differ significantly with all compounds tested except cefuroxime, and were lowest for trovafloxacin and clinafloxacin, followed by sparfloxacin, ciprofloxacin and lomefloxacin; cefuroxime yielded values which increased in line with those of penicillin G. The test compounds were bactericidal (i.e. they reduced original counts by &gt; or = 3 log10 cfu/mL at one dilution above bacteriostatic levels) in most cases, though some strains showed slightly greater discrepancies between bacteriostatic and bactericidal levels of all compounds tested. Trovafloxacin, clinafloxacin and sparfloxacin yielded MIC and time-kill results which point to possible efficacy in treatment of penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococcal infections.

the journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy/journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy

Activity of CP 99,219 (trovafloxacin) compared with ciprofloxacin, sparfloxacin, clinafloxacin, lomefloxacin and cefuroxime against ten penicillin-susceptible and pencillin-resistant pneumococci by time-kill methodology