An Experimental Agenda for Securitization Theory

This is the accepted author manuscript. The final version is available from Oxford University Press via the DOI in this recordSecuritization theory has developed into a fruitful research program on the construction of security threats. The theory has experienced growing sophistication, and empirical studies have produced stimulating insights on issues as varied as the politics of immigration, health, climate change or cybersecurity. Understanding how social issues become perceived as threats seems timelier than ever given the rise in securitizing narratives in recent political elections across the globe. We propose that this research agenda would benefit from broadening its methodological diversity. In particular, the use of experiments could complement existing methods in securitization theory, mitigate some of the program’s methodological weaknesses, and help explain when securitizing moves are likely to succeed or fail.Catarina P. Thomson gratefully acknowledges financial support from the UK Economic and Social Research Council (grant ES/L010879/1)