z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Australian Regulation of Animal Use in Science and Education: A Critical Appraisal
Author(s) -
Aaron Timoshanko,
Helen M. Marston,
Brett A. Lidbury
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
ilar journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.129
H-Index - 75
eISSN - 1930-6180
pISSN - 1084-2020
DOI - 10.1093/ilar/ilw015
Subject(s) - transparency (behavior) , incentive , best practice , critical appraisal , raising (metalworking) , political science , engineering ethics , business , public relations , medicine , economics , engineering , law , microeconomics , mechanical engineering , alternative medicine , pathology
One of the touchstone principles in Australia's regulation of the use of animals for scientific and educational purposes is reduction, refinement and replacement (3Rs). However, the use of animals for scientific and educational purposes is increasing in Australia, raising concerns about the effectiveness of the current regulatory framework in achieving the objectives of the 3Rs. This article critically evaluates the current regulatory framework in Australia. Several strengths are identified. However, 4 recommendations to improve the regulatory environment are proposed to bring Australia in line with international best practice. Specifically, Australian regulation governing the use of animals for scientific or educational purposes could be improved through greater transparency, higher standards of competency, the development of a central regulatory authority, and greater incentives to encourage research and development into nonanimal alternatives.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom