Reporting of ethics in peer-reviewed verbal autopsy studies: a systematic review | Zendy

Rohina Joshi | Zendy; Neha Faruqui | Zendy; Shilpa R. Nagarajan | Zendy; Rasika Rampatige | Zendy; Alex Martiniuk | Zendy; Hebe Gouda | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Reporting of ethics in peer-reviewed verbal autopsy studies: a systematic review

Author(s) -

Rohina Joshi,

Neha Faruqui,

Shilpa R. Nagarajan,

Rasika Rampatige,

Alex Martiniuk,

Hebe Gouda

Publication year - 2017

Publication title -

international journal of epidemiology

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 3.406

H-Index - 208

eISSN - 1464-3685

pISSN - 0300-5771

DOI - 10.1093/ije/dyx216

Subject(s) - respondent , confidentiality , interview , medicine , medline , institutional review board , verbal autopsy , family medicine , cause of death , psychology , psychiatry , pathology , disease , political science , law

Verbal autopsy (VA) is a method that determines the cause of death by interviewing a relative of the deceased about the events occurring before the death, in regions where medical certification of cause of death is incomplete. This paper aims to review the ethical standards reported in peer-reviewed VA studies.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research