Two-sample Mendelian randomization: avoiding the downsides of a powerful, widely applicable but potentially fallible technique | Zendy

Fernando Pires Hartwig | Zendy; Neil M Davies | Zendy; Gibran Hemani | Zendy; George Davey Smith | Zendy

Open Access

Two-sample Mendelian randomization: avoiding the downsides of a powerful, widely applicable but potentially fallible technique

Author(s) -

Fernando Pires Hartwig,

Neil M Davies,

Gibran Hemani,

George Davey Smith

Publication year - 2016

Publication title -

international journal of epidemiology

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 3.406

H-Index - 208

eISSN - 1464-3685

pISSN - 0300-5771

DOI - 10.1093/ije/dyx028

Subject(s) - mendelian randomization , randomization , sample size determination , computer science , sample (material) , medicine , statistics , clinical trial , mathematics , biology , genetics , genetic variants , chemistry , chromatography , gene , genotype

Two-sample Mendelian randomization: avoiding the downsides of a powerful, widely applicable but potentially fallible technique Fernando Pires Hartwig*, Neil Martin Davies, Gibran Hemani and George Davey Smith Postgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil, Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol and School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research