Why do we think we know what we know? A metaknowledge analysis of the salt controversy | Zendy

Ludovic Trinquart | Zendy; David Merritt Johns | Zendy; Sandro Galea | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Why do we think we know what we know? A metaknowledge analysis of the salt controversy

Author(s) -

Ludovic Trinquart,

David Merritt Johns,

Sandro Galea

Publication year - 2016

Publication title -

international journal of epidemiology

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 3.406

H-Index - 208

eISSN - 1464-3685

pISSN - 0300-5771

DOI - 10.1093/ije/dyv184

Subject(s) - systematic review , confidence interval , medicine , population , meta analysis , inclusion (mineral) , public health , citation , environmental health , medline , family medicine , psychology , pathology , social psychology , library science , political science , computer science , law

Although several public health organizations have recommended population-wide reduction in salt intake, the evidence on the population benefits remains unclear. We conducted a metaknowledge analysis of the literature on salt intake and health outcomes.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research