Commentary: LaPiere and methodological opportunism

References 1 LaPiere RT. Attitudes vs. actions. Soc Forces 1934;13: 230–37, (Reprinted Int J Epidemiol 2010;39:7–11). 2 Thorne B. ‘You Still Takin’ Notes?’ Fieldwork and the problems of informed consent. Soc Problems 1980;27:284–96. 3 Brannen J. The study of sensitive subjects. Sociol Rev 1988; 36:552–63. 4 Smith TW. Comment. Public Opin Q 1990;54:436. 5 Warren CA, Karner TX. Permissions and the social context. Am Sociol 1990;21:116–35. 6 Barnard M. Discomforting research: colliding moralities and looking for ‘truth’ in a study of parental drug problems. Sociol Health Illn 2005;27:1–19. 7 Mulder SS, Rance S, Suarez MS, Condori MC. Unethical ethics? Reflections on intercultural research practices. Reprod Health Matters 2000;8:104–12. 8 Dockery TM, Bedeian AG. Attitudes vs. actions: LaPiere’s classic study revisited. Soc Behav Pers 1989;17:9–16. 9 Schuman H. Attitudes vs. actions versus attitudes vs. attitudes. Public Opin Q 1972;36:347–54. 10 Chilungu SW. Issues in the ethics of research method: an interpretation of the anglo-american perspective. Curr Anthropol 1976;17:457–81. 11 Marzano M. Informed consent, deception, and research freedom in qualitative research. Qual Inq 2007; 13:417–36. 12 Dyer S, Demeritt D. Unethical review? Why it is wrong to apply the medical model of research to Human Geography. Prog Hum Geogr 2009;33:46–64. 13 Nyambedha EO. Ethical dilemmas of social science research on AIDS and orphanhood in western Kenya. Soc Sci Med 2008;67:771–79. 14 Corrigan O. Empty ethics: the problem with informed consent. Sociol Health Illn 2003;25:768–92. 15 Burchard WW. A study of attitudes toward the use of concealed devices in social science research. Soc Forces 1957;36:111–16.