z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Assessment of cumulative evidence on genetic associations: interim guidelines
Author(s) -
John P. A. Ioannidis,
Paolo Boffetta,
Julian Little,
T. R O'Brien,
André G. Uitterlinden,
Paolo Vineis,
David J. Balding,
Anand P. Chokkalingam,
Siobhan M. Dolan,
W. Dana Flanders,
Julian P. T. Higgins,
Mark I. McCarthy,
David H. McDermott,
Grier P. Page,
Timothy R. Rebbeck,
Daniela Seminara,
Muin J. Khoury
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
international journal of epidemiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.406
H-Index - 208
eISSN - 1464-3685
pISSN - 0300-5771
DOI - 10.1093/ije/dym159
Subject(s) - interim , epidemiology , credibility , replication (statistics) , causal inference , inference , medicine , computer science , pathology , geography , political science , archaeology , virology , artificial intelligence , law
Established guidelines for causal inference in epidemiological studies may be inappropriate for genetic associations. A consensus process was used to develop guidance criteria for assessing cumulative epidemiologic evidence in genetic associations. A proposed semi-quantitative index assigns three levels for the amount of evidence, extent of replication, and protection from bias, and also generates a composite assessment of 'strong', 'moderate' or 'weak' epidemiological credibility. In addition, we discuss how additional input and guidance can be derived from biological data. Future empirical research and consensus development are needed to develop an integrated model for combining epidemiological and biological evidence in the rapidly evolving field of investigation of genetic factors.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom