Data-driven measures to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 in South America: how do regional programmes compare to best practice?
Author(s) -
Taís Fernanda Blauth,
Oskar Josef Gstrein
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
international data privacy law
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.371
H-Index - 20
eISSN - 2044-4001
pISSN - 2044-3994
DOI - 10.1093/idpl/ipab002
Subject(s) - dignity , covid-19 , transparency (behavior) , best practice , human rights , geography , political science , economic growth , business , medicine , economics , law , disease , pathology , infectious disease (medical specialty) , virology , outbreak
• This article analyses data-driven measures used in South America to mitigate the impact of COVID-19. Based on a broad review of relevant programmes in the region three selected cases from Argentina (Cuidar App), Brazil (use of personal data by IBGE ), and Chile (CoronApp) are evaluated against best regional and international practices. • Our findings suggest that programmes in South America mirror approaches in other global regions and as such face many similar challenges. There is no clearly defined purpose, a lack of transparency, and the need for readjustment soon after initial development. • While the region is heavily affected by COVID-19, the three case-studies analysed demonstrate that policy makers in the region failed to establish trust in the measures. This can be deducted from low penetration rates of the programmes in Argentina and Chile. • Finally, there are serious concerns regarding the long-term impact of these programmes upon human rights (especially privacy) and human dignity.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom